After approving the business case, a project sponsor disengages entirely, forcing the project manager to take all significant decisions without support. Which governance weakness does this best illustrate?

Question

TheoryPractice · Accepted Answer

Active oversight and the exercise of decision-making authority have lapsed. Effective governance involves ongoing oversight and the exercise of decision-making authority throughout the project, not simply approving documents at the outset.

Why the other options are incorrect:
• There is no clearly defined approach to delivering the project: The absence of a delivery methodology is not what this scenario highlights; the core issue is a failure of governance oversight.
• The project manager has handed over too much authority to others: The problem is not that the project manager has delegated too much, but that the sponsor is failing to remain involved.
• The governance framework is overly complex for a project of this size: Nothing in the scenario suggests the governance framework is excessively detailed.
• Members of the project team have not correctly understood what the project is trying to achieve: The team's understanding of project objectives is not in question here; the issue is who holds decision-making authority.

After approving the business case, a project sponsor disengages entirely, forcing the project manager to take all significant decisions without support. Which governance weakness does this best illustrate?

Related questions

Free practice here. Timed mocks when you are ready.