TheorySQE1 Solicitors Exam Prep Study Guide
Study for the SQE1 Solicitors Exam Prep with exam topics, practice questions, a free PDF, video walkthrough and timed mock exam links.
How to study for SQE1 Solicitors Exam Prep
- Read the topic list so you know what the exam is likely to cover.
- Answer the free practice questions and read every explanation.
- Download the PDF for offline review.
- Use timed mock exams when your untimed practice feels comfortable.
Topics to review
- Hazard identification and risk control
- Required workplace procedures
- Personal protective equipment and safe practice
- Compliance, reporting and documentation
Try SQE1 Solicitors Exam Prep questions now
Q1A property developer is seeking to prevent a neighbouring landowner from constructing a warehouse that would block natural light to the developer's recently completed residential building. The developer applies for an interim injunction. The proposed warehouse construction has not yet begun, but planning permission has been granted and materials have been delivered to the site. The developer's solicitor advises that the court will require security before granting relief.
Show answer
✓ Correct answer: The court will commonly require an undertaking in damages because a mandatory injunction would disrupt the status quo by requiring the neighbour to refrain from starting planned construction.
The correct answer recognizes that although the injunction sought appears prohibitory in form (restraining construction), it may have mandatory effect by disrupting the status quo where the neighbour has obtained planning permission and prepared to build. Courts typically require an undertaking in damages to protect the defendant if the injunction is later found to have been wrongly granted. Distractor 1 incorrectly suggests no undertaking is needed for purely prohibitory relief. Distractor 2 wrongly states that undertakings are never required when planning permission exists. Distractor 3 misapplies the test by focusing on construction timing rather than status quo disruption. Distractor 4 incorrectly suggests mandatory injunctions cannot be granted at the interim stage.
Q2A claimant issues proceedings in the County Court against a defendant contractor for damages of £120,000 arising from alleged defective building work. The claim is allocated to the multi-track. The court gives case management directions requiring the parties to file and exchange costs budgets by a specified date, which is 21 days before the first case management conference. The defendant's solicitor is unfamiliar with costs budgeting requirements and asks whether the same obligations would apply if the claim had been allocated to a different track.
Show answer
✓ Correct answer: Costs budgets are required on the multi-track where directed by the court, but not on the small claims track where costs recovery is generally limited to fixed costs.
The correct answer identifies that costs budgeting under CPR Part 3 Section II applies to multi-track cases (and some fast track cases) where the court so directs, but the small claims track operates under different costs rules with very limited costs recovery, making detailed budgeting unnecessary and disproportionate. Distractor 1 wrongly suggests budgets are never required on fast track. Distractor 2 incorrectly states that all civil claims require budgets regardless of track. Distractor 3 misapplies the financial threshold for budgeting exemptions. Distractor 4 wrongly suggests budgets are optional rather than mandatory when directed.
Q3A potential claimant consults a solicitor about a personal injury claim arising from a road traffic accident that occurred 34 months ago. The claimant has one witness who supports the claimant's version of events, but the defendant has two witnesses who provide a different account. The claimant's witness is the claimant's brother-in-law, who was a passenger in the claimant's vehicle. The defendant's witnesses are independent motorists who were traveling in the opposite direction. The solicitor is assessing the merits of the claim before advising whether to commence proceedings. Medical evidence clearly establishes the extent of the claimant's injuries.
Show answer
✓ Correct answer: The claim faces significant evidential challenges due to conflicting witness accounts, and limitation is about to expire, requiring urgent consideration of whether to issue protective proceedings despite witness reliability concerns.
The correct answer recognizes both the critical limitation issue (the three-year limitation period for personal injury claims is nearly expired at 34 months) and the witness reliability problem (the claimant's only witness is a family member passenger, while the defendant has two independent witnesses). A solicitor must not neglect limitation when advising on proceedings, as specified in the assessment criteria. The answer balances the need to preserve the claim by issuing protective proceedings with the evidential weakness on liability. Distractor 1 ignores the imminent limitation deadline. Distractor 2 wrongly dismisses the relevance of witness relationships to credibility. Distractor 3 incorrectly suggests that strong medical evidence on quantum overcomes weak liability evidence. Distractor 4 wrongly implies that limitation can be easily extended.
Q4A claimant in a clinical negligence action wishes to obtain expert evidence on three distinct issues: whether the defendant surgeon's operative technique fell below the acceptable standard; whether the hospital's post-operative monitoring protocols were adequate; and whether the claimant's subsequent psychological harm was a foreseeable consequence of the alleged negligence. The claimant's solicitor is instructing experts and drafting letters of instruction. The claimant's legal team includes a partner who previously worked as a nurse and has strong views on appropriate post-operative care standards.
Show answer
✓ Correct answer: Separate experts in surgery, hospital protocols, and psychiatry should be instructed, with questions limited to matters requiring specialist opinion in each field, excluding areas within the court's or solicitor's competence.
The correct answer applies the principle that expert evidence should be limited to matters requiring specialist opinion and that questions to experts should be confined to issues genuinely outside the expertise of legal representatives and the court. Each of the three issues requires different specialist knowledge: surgical practice, hospital administration protocols, and psychiatric causation. The partner's nursing background does not provide expert-level opinion on any of these specific areas and cannot substitute for properly qualified expert evidence. Distractor 1 wrongly suggests a single expert can cover all issues. Distractor 2 incorrectly implies the partner's nursing experience can replace expert evidence. Distractor 3 wrongly suggests expert evidence on foreseeability is unnecessary. Distractor 4 incorrectly limits the number of experts arbitrarily.
Q5A solicitor is preparing a witness statement for trial in a breach of contract claim. The witness is a former employee of the claimant who left the company two years ago. The statement includes: (1) the witness's recollection of events during their employment; (2) the witness's opinion that the defendant 'clearly intended to breach the agreement'; (3) a paragraph stating 'I was told by my manager that the defendant had said they would not perform'; and (4) the witness's signature and a statement of truth. The statement runs to 15 pages and includes extensive commentary on the defendant's business practices unrelated to the contract dispute. Which of the following best describes the primary deficiency in this witness statement?
Show answer
✓ Correct answer: The statement contains inadmissible hearsay and argumentative opinion that should be excluded.
The statement is deficient because it includes hearsay (what the manager was told) and argumentative opinion ('clearly intended to breach'). Witness statements must be confined to matters of fact within the witness's own knowledge and should avoid argument. The statement is also prolix with irrelevant commentary. While the signature and statement of truth are present, the content deficiencies are more fundamental. The other options incorrectly focus on the witness's status, the statement's length alone, or formatting issues that are secondary to the substantive inadmissibility of hearsay and opinion evidence.
Q6A claimant's solicitor is preparing the trial bundle for a High Court commercial dispute scheduled to commence in five days. The court's case management order specified that the bundle must be lodged seven days before trial and contain: pleadings, disclosure documents, witness statements, expert reports, and a chronology. The solicitor discovers that: (1) the bundle contains all pleadings and witness statements but omits three key disclosed emails that support the claimant's case; (2) the bundle includes the claimant's expert report but not the defendant's, which was exchanged on time; (3) the bundle is indexed but pages are not numbered consecutively; and (4) no chronology has been prepared. The defendant's solicitor has not yet filed their bundle. Which of the following represents the most serious procedural failing that could result in sanctions?
Show answer
✓ Correct answer: Failure to lodge the bundle within the seven-day deadline as specified in the court order.
The most serious failing is missing the court-ordered deadline for lodging the bundle seven days before trial. Non-compliance with court directions can result in sanctions including costs orders, adverse inferences, or adjournment with costs consequences. While the other deficiencies (missing documents, lack of pagination, no chronology, and omission of the defendant's expert report) are serious and must be remedied, breach of a court order deadline is the most fundamental procedural failing. The court can impose sanctions under CPR 3.9 for failure to comply with rules, practice directions, or court orders.
Full SQE1 Solicitors Exam Prep bank + unlimited mocks
Try 30 questions free. Unlock the complete SQE1 Solicitors Exam Prep question bank, every explanation, and unlimited timed mock exams. Practice on any device.
Unlock SQE1 Solicitors Exam Prep →