What is the proper response when a business owner requests additional time to correct a non-life-threatening code violation?

What is the proper response when a business

Multiple choice — select the best answer

AIgnore the violation completely since it's non-life-threatening
BAlways deny all extension requests regardless of circumstances
CVerbally agree without documenting the extension
DFollow AHJ policies for time extensions, documenting the request and decision according to procedures

✓ Correct answer: D. Follow AHJ policies for time extensions, documenting the request and decision according to procedures For non-life-threatening violations, inspectors should follow AHJ policies regarding extensions, which typically allow reasonable time extensions when formally requested and documented.

.q-expl{display:block!important}.q-opt[data-idx="3"]{border-color:#16a34a;background:#f0fdf4}.q-opt[data-idx="3"] .oltr{background:#16a34a;color:#fff}.q-opt{cursor:default!important;pointer-events:none}

Keep practising. Use the free Fire Inspector CFI Exam Prep PDF, watch the YouTube walkthrough, or unlock all 10 web questions with timed mock exams.

Free PDF Video walkthrough

← Previous Next → 🎲 Random question ↩ Back to all questions

Keep practising

What is the proper response when a business owner requests additional time to correct a non-life-threatening code violation?

Related questions

Free practice here. Timed mocks when you are ready.