Which statement, if proven, is sufficient to conclude that a detainee is NOT the person named in an arrest warrant?

Which statement, if proven, is sufficient to

Multiple choice — select the best answer

AThe detainee denies the name
BThe detainee's verified fingerprints do not match the warrant subject's prints
CThe detainee has a common last name
DThe detainee was calm during questioning

✓ Correct answer: B. The detainee's verified fingerprints do not match the warrant subject's prints Non-matching verified fingerprints establish a different identity, which is sufficient. A denial, a common name, or demeanor do not prove identity either way.

.q-expl{display:block!important}.q-opt[data-idx="1"]{border-color:#16a34a;background:#f0fdf4}.q-opt[data-idx="1"] .oltr{background:#16a34a;color:#fff}.q-opt{cursor:default!important;pointer-events:none}

Keep practising. Use the free Border Patrol PDF, watch the YouTube walkthrough, or unlock all 10 web questions with timed mock exams.

Free PDF Video walkthrough

Topic: Decision Making

← Previous 🎲 Random question ↩ Back to all questions

Keep practising

Which statement, if proven, is sufficient to conclude that a detainee is NOT the person named in an arrest warrant?

Related questions — Decision Making

Free practice here. Timed mocks when you are ready.